SCOTUS Snapshot: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections
The Supreme Court convened today to hear oral arguments in two consolidated cases brought by several small businesses and twelve states. The plaintiffs challenge President Trump’s authority to impose tariffs on goods imported into the United States.
President Trump based his actions primarily on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), asserting that the law grants the president power to address unusual or extraordinary threats to the nation’s security, foreign policy, or economy that originate outside the country.
The Act provides that, during a national emergency, the president may regulate the import or export of property in which a foreign country has an interest.
The Trump administration argues that the ability to regulate importation inherently includes the authority to impose tariffs under the IEEPA framework.
Opponents contend this interpretation stretches the statute beyond its intended scope, violating the major questions doctrine, which restricts the president from making significant economic decisions without explicit congressional authorization.
The outcome of this case will directly affect consumers and businesses across the United States, as well as international trading partners.
Author’s Summary
This case tests the limits of presidential power under the IEEPA, determining whether President Trump’s tariff actions align with congressional intent and constitutional boundaries.