Some federal judges have expressed dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court's repeated grant of interim relief to the Trump Administration in cases challenging its actions, as reported by The New York Times.
Over three dozen federal judges have shared their concerns with The New York Times, stating that the Supreme Court's brief and opaque emergency orders have caused confusion and are damaging the judiciary's public image.
The Supreme Court's flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders in cases related to the Trump administration have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary's image with the public.
This unusual critique from lower court judges highlights the strain on the federal judicial system due to litigation over the Trump agenda.
The story is based on a selective survey of federal judges conducted by The New York Times.
Author's summary: Federal judges criticize Supreme Court.