The Other Arguments in Trump’s Tariffs Case
When the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Wednesday regarding the challenges to the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through executive orders earlier this year, three lawyers will represent different parties: small businesses, a coalition of 12 states, and the Trump administration, which defends the tariffs.
In addition to the oral arguments, the justices will review 44 amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs submitted by diverse stakeholders, including members of Congress, trade experts, legal scholars, think tanks founded by former Vice President Mike Pence and presidential adviser Stephen Miller, the watch industry, and a vineyard owner.
These briefs address a broad array of issues, from the tariffs’ economic impact to the historical interpretation of trade law. Notably, opponents of the tariffs outnumber their proponents significantly.
Focus on the Text of IEEPA
Some briefs emphasize the statutory language of IEEPA. One such brief, submitted on behalf of 207 members of Congress—among them Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska—argues that IEEPA does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs.
The brief on behalf of 207 members of Congress states, "IEEPA does not give the president the power to impose the tariffs."
Range of Perspectives in Briefs
- Members of Congress provide a legal interpretation restricting presidential powers under IEEPA.
- Trade experts analyze the tariffs’ effects on commerce and international relations.
- Legal scholars and think tanks contribute historical context on trade legislation and executive power.
- Industry representatives, such as the watch industry and a vineyard owner, present the tariffs’ practical impacts.
The breadth of the arguments reflects the complexity of the case and the varied interests affected by the tariffs.
Author’s Summary: The Supreme Court case on Trump’s tariffs involves complex legal and economic issues, with diverse stakeholders challenging the scope of presidential authority under IEEPA.
Would you like the text to have a more formal or conversational tone?More News
- ‘Reviewing it’: Hegseth on releasing video of Caribbean strike; survivors died on alleged drug boat
- ‘My heart is broken’: Domestic worker mourns sister who died in Hong Kong fire
- Etihad’s A380 to Tokyo in Summer 2026
- Etihad Airways Adds New 8-Hour Airbus A321LR Flights To Europe
- 01 – Air Libre - Podcasts
- Kayla Harrison’s Shredded UFC 324 Faceoff Look Sends Fans Into A Frenzy
- 41 People Who Almost Died Are Sharing How They Barely Survived
- November Routes Roundup: Etihad Airways Launches Abu Dhabi–Tokyo A380 Service
- Etihad to welcome over 2 million December passengers as winter travel demand soars
- [Les structures causales en français : exprimer la cause]